The New Rules for Safely Eating Seasonal Seafood. An old rule of thumb warns that shellfish should be avoided during months with no R’s—May, June, July, and August—exactly the season that many of us are heading for the shore and eager to sample the fruits of the sea. Do you really need to take the entire summer off from shellfish? And is the old saw about avoiding sushi on Mondays still accurate? We decided to check in on some of the old and new guidelines for seafood- eating to see what’s out of date, what new rules have fallen into place, and how to gorge ourselves on aquatic delights without running the risk of food poisoning (or worse).

Season- to- Season Guidelines. The old “months with no ‘R’s” rule comes from a couple of places, says Kate Brogan, of National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Fisheries Department.

1. An automatic firmware update broke LockState’s internet-enabled “smart locks” for around 500 customers earlier this month, including around 200 Airbnb hosts who.
2. Kilauea; Mount Etna; Mount Yasur; Mount Nyiragongo and Nyamuragira; Piton de la Fournaise; Erta Ale.

Search or upload videos. Popular on YouTube: Music, Sports, Gaming, Movies, TV Shows, News, Spotlight. Browse Channels. An old rule of thumb warns that shellfish should be avoided during months with no R’s—May, June, July, and August—exactly the season that many of us are heading. Issuu is a digital publishing platform that makes it simple to publish magazines, catalogs, newspapers, books, and more online. Hot Dogs Online Putlocker there. Easily share your publications and get.

Bleu at the Broadway theatre, Godspell in New York City, April 11, 2012.

First, oysters spawn during summer, and during this process their glycogen (stored starch that imparts a sweets taste) turns into gametes, changing the flavor and texture so that they are, as Brogan puts it “well, not great.” Second, says Brogan, “In the pre- refrigeration days you did not want to eat an oyster that had been sitting in the hot sun all day.”These days, says Brogan, “there really are no months without an R because we have Refrigeration now!” And newer regulations also mean that the R- rule can be safely set aside. Some states have oyster curfews to ensure that growers must harvest their oysters before noon or midmorning, depending on the month, “to avoid the shellfish being out in the midday heat,” she says. So while oysters may not be taste the best during hot summer months, they shouldn’t make you sick (and the same goes for other shellfish). As someone who writes about how to make delicious food, I am all about DIY- ing your own versions of …Read more Read.

Another possible source of the R- month rule, however, is that harmful algal blooms are more common in warmer months, according to the EPA, which also warns that climate change is making these blooms more common year round. Some species of phytoplankton produce toxins, which in turn can enter the food chain when shellfish or other sea creatures eat that phytoplankton, leading to foodborne illness. These can have serious effects, ranging from digestive distress to numbness, tingling, even mild memory disturbances, says Dr. Lynn Grattan, of the University of Maryland School of Medicine, who studies the effects of marine toxins on coastal communities. This is a good reason to use caution when eating shellfish, but this doesn’t necessarily mean avoiding shellfish during summer months, says Grattan.

While there are some regional patterns for the emergence of harmful algal blooms, in the US, some fish or shellfish can retain the toxin for long periods of time. Thus, the bloom may be over, but the fish or shellfish may still be toxic.”When our very own editor- in- chief sent me a recipe for ceviche, I was excited, because ceviche…Read more Read. The best bet is to opt for US- based fish and shellfish, says Grattan. In the US there are strict regulator guidelines for fishing, harvesting and distribution which are carefully and expertly monitored,” including monitoring of harmful algal blooms. Grattan advises consumers to watch out for, and follow, any warnings or closures from state Departments of Health or Fish and Wildlife, and to pay close attention to any advisories offered on restaurant menus.

Harmful algal blooms have been reported in every coastal state, as well as the Great Lakes. Many states issue local warnings, and NOAA maintains a website with early warnings for harmful algal blooms around the country where you can also subscribe for updates on blooms in certain bodies of water. These warning systems aren’t perfect, and Grattan notes that “seafood consumption is the leading cause of foodborne illness with known etiology.” But you can lower your risk by eating domestic seafood and making yourself aware of any warnings—no matter what time of year. People are freaking out about a recent story where a man who ate sushi ended up with a stomach…Read more Read. Week- to- Week Guidelines. Kill Your Darlings Full Movie Online Free on this page.

In his 2. 00. 0 memoir Kitchen Confidential, Anthony Bourdain said he never orders fish on a Monday. In New York City, he wrote, the fish markets were closed over the weekend and restaurants did not get fresh fish delivered on Sundays, so on Monday the fish was likely to have been sitting around for a couple of days. This rule has definitely made the rounds, with plenty of online message boards debating whether sushi and other restaurant seafood is off limits on Sundays, Mondays or both. Seafood is tasty, seafood is fun, but eat too much of the wrong kinds and our grand- kids will have…Read more Read. But last year, Bourdain himself declared this rule outdated, because the demand for and knowledge about seafood is so much greater than it was even 1. It was a different world. Now, we know what good fish should look like and smell like,” he told Business Insider in 2.

So as long as it’s a reputable restaurant, any day of the week is fair game. Minding That Mercury. No matter what time of year or day of the week you’re eating seafood, one rule still holds true: don’t overdo it, lest you put yourself at risk of mercury poisoning. The heavy metal accumulates most in large, predatory fish such as swordfish, tuna, and sharks, but other species like bluegill and striped bass can contain enough mercury to cause problems for people who eat fish regularly.

Those who are pregnant or nursing should avoid these species altogether (you can see the full FDA guidelines here). Dr. Michael Gochfeld, MD/Ph.

D, who specializes in mercury poisoning, says that some people who eat fish several times a week will show signs of mercury poisoning. A recurring theme in our clinic is, ‘for health reasons, I ate a can of tuna every day for years.’” Gochfeld strongly believes that fish is part of a healthful diet, up to one once or twice a week. People who eat fish more often than that, he advises, should pay close attention to to the mercury levels in their fish, and aim to eat fish that are very low in mercury, and stick with 3- 4 ounces per meal. Smaller species, like anchovies, sardines, and scallops, are particularly low in mercury; catfish, salmon, and tilapia are also safe bets. For more details, there are lots of guides out there, including this one from the NRDC.

We Asked Five Security Experts If Smart Locks Are Ever Safe. An automatic firmware update broke Lock. State’s internet- enabled “smart locks” for around 5. Airbnb hosts who use the locks to remotely manage rental access.

Customers have to replace their locks or ship them back for repairs. Watch Fight To The Finish Putlocker# on this page. The locks can still be operated with a physical key.)Smart locks, like so many “Internet of Things” devices, are vulnerable to a host of tech issues.

Last year security consultant Anthony Rose revealed huge security flaws in Bluetooth- enabled door locks. Of the 1. 6 locks he tested, Rose managed to break into 1. Smart locks don’t seem any more foolproof than when our sister site Gizmodo explored smart- lock security four years ago. We asked five security experts whether these locks are fundamentally insecure. None of these experts is ready to entirely write off all smart locks.

Like so much of technology, you simply have to decide who to trust and how much to trust them,” says security technologist, author, and Harvard lecturer Bruce Schneier, who testified before Congress last year about the “catastrophic risks” of insecure internet- enabled devices.“There is always a risk that a net- enabled lock will get bricked or hacked,” says MIT professor Stuart Madnick, “most likely due to the actions (or carelessness) of the owner.” But he points out that old- fashioned key- and- lock solutions have their own user- created risks: “One of my popular sayings is: ‘You may buy a stronger lock for your door, but if you still leave the key under the mat, are you really any more secure?’”Madnick compares the trade- off to the increased risks of driving a car instead of a horse. Are you willing to trade your car in for a horse?”Jeremiah Grossman, Chief of Security Strategy at cybersecurity firm Sentinel. One, compares smart locks to older remote systems like prison security doors and receptionist- controlled buzzers. He says internet- connected locks can sometimes be an appropriate solution: Would I personally entrust the security of my home to such a device? Not at the moment, but in the future as the devices get better and more secure I might trust them more. Should others use them?

Sure, depending on their living situation. And people might consider using them for doorways where what they’re securing isn’t critically important to them. That’s one hell of a caveat for a $4. Grossman recently tweeted about deeper implications of an insecure smart lock update system: But Grossman says we shouldn’t ask whether smart locks are “fundamentally insecure” but whether they are “secure enough for a given application.”Alan Grau, co- founder of security software provider Icon Labs, puts it similarly: There is no question people are going to use smart locks despite the risks.

I think the questions to be asked are not if these solutions should be used, but rather what are the risks? How do these risks compare to traditional locks? What can [lock makers] do to ensure that a reasonable layer of security is built into these devices? Security reporter Brian Krebs had the harshest words, saying it bothers him that so many people are installing smart locks.

To break through a lock, he says, an attacker has always had to be on- site. With internet- enabled locks, you’ve removed that expensive (and from an attacker’s perspective, risky) cost from the equation.” He still won’t write off the technology entirely. I am not saying there can’t be remotely- enabled locks that are also secure. But I’d wager on balance that most of those in use today are probably nowhere near as secure as they should be.”With all these caveats, the consensus seems to be that smart locks trade off a lot of expected security for more convenience. Before you buy a smart lock, research its known security issues, and know that new ones could crop up. But remember that if you use it wrong, any lock is insecure.